Many people have the feeling of "more is better," but clearly when it comes to RAM in the virtual machine, that is not necessarily the case. That said, if you don't have a specific need, then don't bother, it's not worth it just stick with Windows XP on a single virtual processor. If you have a real need for either, and can articulate a reason for it, than use them. When it comes to whether you should use multiple processors or 64-bit virtual machines that depends on your use. While the Vista "penalty" that we saw in prior tests is now mostly gone (presumably because both Vista SP1 made improvements as well as both of these virtualization products), we would advise that you stick with Windows XP given how much better it runs overall (not to mention how much less annoying it is). In the end, your decision as to which product you should take into account what's most important to you: speed, footprint, graphics capabilities, features, user interface, OS you want to run, and more all come into play.
#Vmware virtual machine installed mac os x 10.5.5 for windows for mac#
VMware Fusion (cont.) How do VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop for Mac stack up?īy Neil Ticktin, Editor-in-Chief/Publisher < Previous Page Startīoth VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop for Mac are excellent products, and both allow you to run Windows XP and Vista quite well. VMware FusionĬolumn Tag: Virtualization Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. Educational Institution and Student Discounts.
0 kommentar(er)
